GINA MARIE GAZVODA · PUBLIC RECORD PROJECT
Justice for Gina organizes verified court developments, public records, sworn testimony, expert materials, documented conflicts, and the records still needed for independent review.
CURRENT COMMAND VIEW
Each item is classified by the strongest available source. A court finding is not treated the same as a pending charge, an official record, sworn testimony, an expert opinion, or a family interpretation.
The Waterbury Probate Court revoked the July 28, 2019 will after the parties stipulated that the will was fraudulent. Nicholas Forte was removed as executor and Edward Duffy was appointed administrator.
Read the scope and limits →A Connecticut criminal docket lists an arrest and pending charges of Forgery in the Second Degree and Conspiracy to Commit Forgery in the Second Degree.
The accused is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Open the docket summary →The controlled OCME record is a telephone notice and contact history—not an autopsy report. It documents a declination without an OCME autopsy, toxicology, scene examination, or independent injury assessment.
See what this does and does not prove →Dr. Nirmala Panwar testified that she did not view Gina's body, while the death certificate identifies her as both pronouncer and medical certifier. A dedicated public review explains the apparent statutory conflict.
Open the source-controlled review →Nicholas A. Forte’s signed PC-242 administration account for the Estate of Gina Marie Gazvoda lists a $17,240.98 legal fee to Charles L. Kurmay inside completed distributions to heirs or beneficiaries, while reporting $0.00 in administration expenses.
The form does not identify the legal matter billed, contain a court approval of the fee, or find theft or misuse.
Read the account summary →A source-labeled review of recorded statements by Robert S. Kolesnik Jr., counsel for Nicholas Forte, identified 13 contradiction-flagged statements that cluster into four pairs, including a signature-comparison objection later followed by lay comparison questions, and a July 2019 will presented for probate after the April 22, 2026 fraud stipulation.
These are documented conflicts among statements. They are not findings of professional misconduct or a court determination that any statement was knowingly false.
Open the source-controlled review →THE MISSING RECORDS MATTER
The accessible-source review is substantially organized. The decisive remaining evidence is increasingly held by outside custodians.
First signed form, corrected form, EDRS field history, source worksheets, access logs, and correction trail.
Native CAD history, audio, supplements, photographs, device data, audit history, and complete ePCR records.
Native communications, source attribution, custody logs, completed authority forms, and complete operational records.
Original directives, native emails and attachments, source-device metadata, earliest-generation scans, and documented custody.
The exact Wells Fargo death-certificate image, submission metadata, access history, retention history, and custodian certification.
CHOOSE YOUR PATH
The site is organized for the public, journalists, attorneys, experts, and supporters.
Learn about Gina, the project, its publisher, and the official #JusticeForGina channels.
Open project identity → 02See what is verified, pending, disputed, or still missing.
Open dashboard → 03Search public materials with status and provenance context.
Search records → 04Follow documented events in sequence without collapsing source classes.
Follow chronology → 05Access reporting cautions, contacts, and source-packet requests.
Open press room → 06Review planned uses, safeguards, limits, and donor expectations.
See funding plan → 07Understand how records are selected, labeled, redacted, and preserved.
Read standards →HELP MOVE THE RECORD FORWARD
Contributions do not purchase conclusions or guarantee outcomes. They help fund the work required to obtain, preserve, analyze, and present evidence responsibly.