Documented entry
A date or event shown in a court or official record supplied to the project.
EVIDENCE-LINKED CHRONOLOGY · V4
A record built in sequence—and connected to its sources.
High-level events remain clearly separated by source class. Where an approved public record exists, the entry links to its provenance, verification, authority, sensitivity, and revision history.
STATUS KEY
Know what each label means.
A date may be documented in a supplied court record, maintained in the family's chronology, represent an archive-review period, or mark a project update.
Family-maintained entry
An event central to the family's account, pending fuller source publication or verification.
Materials under review
A period represented by multiple records that require document-by-document organization.
Public-record work
A milestone in building the archive, outreach, or responsible public review process.
Gina Gazvoda dies
The event at the center of the family's search for answers. Medical, law-enforcement, witness, probate, and related materials are being organized for qualified review.
Family chronology Restricted archive metadata →Offense date listed in criminal docket
The supplied Connecticut court record lists this date in connection with the pending forgery-related charges.
Court record Related timeline record →Attorney General complaint filed against Nirmala Panwar and others
The State of Connecticut, represented by Attorney General William Tong, filed a complaint dated August 15, 2023, in HHD-CV23-6173328-S alleging False Claims Act and related Medicaid-billing claims against Nirmala Panwar, Davender Panwar, and Yale Home Care Physicians Inc. The case remains pending, with no disposition displayed as of November 12, 2026. This filing is a separate civil action and does not decide facts about Gina Gazvoda’s death.
Court record Case-status summary →Probate, civil, medical, and investigative materials accumulate
The family gathered filings, correspondence, medical records, police materials, expert reviews, recordings, and timelines. These materials require source-by-source verification and privacy review before publication.
Archive period Structured evidence packet →Affidavit of time claimed sworn in Rupe v. Laudisi
In Rupe v. Laudisi, UWY-CV23-6069106-S, a separate Waterbury Superior Court civil action, Robert S. Kolesnik, Esq., signed an affidavit in re time claimed on Motion for Sanctions #151.00. The jurat states the affidavit was subscribed and sworn on January 16, 2025. This filing is a separate civil action and does not decide facts about Gina Gazvoda’s death.
Court recordHandwriting examination report dated March 27, 2025
A 71-page handwriting examination report dated March 27, 2025, identifies Grace Warmbier as the analyst and Garrison Gazvoda as the client. Expert conclusions remain within the report’s stated scope and are not court findings.
Expert report Related expert record →Waterbury Probate Court revokes the July 28, 2019 will
The April 22, 2026 decrees in 21-01204 record that the parties stipulated the original will dated July 28, 2019, admitted to probate, is fraudulent. The court revoked that will, removed Nicholas Forte as executor, and appointed Edward Duffy as administrator.
Court record Probate ruling summary →Affidavit of counsel fees sworn in Rupe v. Laudisi
In the same Rupe v. Laudisi action, UWY-CV23-6069106-S, Robert S. Kolesnik, Jr., signed an Affidavit of Counsel Fees concerning Motion for Counsel Fees (No. 191.00). The jurat states the affidavit was subscribed and sworn on April 23, 2026. This filing is a separate civil action and does not decide facts about Gina Gazvoda’s death.
Court recordSigned PC-242 estate account lists a $17,240.98 legal fee
Nicholas A. Forte signed a PC-242 administration account reporting $0.00 in administration expenses and listing a $17,240.98 legal fee to Charles L. Kurmay among completed distributions. The account does not itself approve the fee or find misuse.
Official record Account summary →Arrest shown in supplied Connecticut court record
Nicholas Anthony Forte Jr. is listed as arrested under docket U04W-CR26-0519807-S on two forgery-related charges. The charges are pending, and the accused is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.
Court record Related expert record →Counsel letter states will-witness affidavits have not been signed
In a letter to Judge Vaccarelli concerning Estate of Gina Gazvoda 21-01204, Robert S. Kolesnik Jr. wrote that the witnesses to the execution of the will “have not signed their affidavits, although we believed they were signed some time ago.”
Documented entry Counsel-statement review →PC-200 petition presents a will dated July 28, 2019
A petition for probate of will dated August 6, 2026, in the Estate of Gina Marie Gazvoda presents a will dated July 28, 2019. Whether the attached instrument is the same will revoked on April 22, 2026, requires comparison of the attachment to the revoked instrument.
Official record Counsel-statement review →Next court date listed on the criminal docket
The supplied Connecticut docket for U04W-CR26-0519807-S lists a next court date of December 4, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., described as Pre-Trial. The docket stated that its information was accurate as of November 11, 2026. The charges remain pending, and the accused is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.
Court record Docket summary →Public information site and review archive begin
Justice for Gina begins organizing a source-labeled public record for journalists, attorneys, advocates, qualified experts, and the public.
Project update Case presentation record →Evidence Intelligence V4 launches
The public archive adds structured evidence records, provenance, verification status, sensitivity classes, publication authority, related events, and visible revision history while restricted source files remain outside the public repository.
Project update Open V4 archive →Verification, redaction, and independent outreach continue
Additional entries and page-level citations will be added only after their sources are reviewed and publication status is clear.
Ongoing project workCorrection policy: When a source changes, a court record is updated, or a timeline entry is found to be incomplete, the project will revise the entry and preserve its public revision history.
FOLLOW THE SOURCES